group 65 - 1. When needed the steadiness of the shot was very good.
2. The framming of the shot was to an average standard.
3. Their was a few different shots used in this and the usage of a few particular shots helped make the quality of the film improve especially the use of the close ups.
4. The shooting of the material wasn't appropriate to the task as it wasn't really an opening scene.
5. There was no mise-en-scene to a high a standard.
6. The editing makes the open scene a lot better as the part where the clip slows down and speeds back up was truly enjoyable and the bit of editing where it seems one of the characters was knocked out.
7.
group 64 -
the first major problem is that there are things in the scene that shouldn't be there, for example we see the tripod in numerous places and we also character who should somewhere else just in the background. The handheld in the forest was really good, good use of point of view, however in the library you should have used a tripod, we could see it in the background and the shots were quite shakey. Mise-en-scene is quite effective, the teacher character is what you might expect the character to look/sound like. the panning in the carpark scene was quite smooth but the slow motion was a bit too slow and confusing.
Group 63:
The first problem which we identified was that the tripod was left in one of the shots. Also there are a lot of unneccessary handheld shots. When they ask the teacher about the lines he replies with an answer which doesnt make sense ( this would confuse young children). When one of the characters fell over, it was comical however the slow motion was dragged out a little bit and may have resulted in children becoming bored. We thought that the sound effects worked well. and we liked the camera shot of the teacher walking and being filmed through a bookshelf. Also the characters are sometimes in the wrong places for each shot (e.g when in the forest martin is standing on one side of george and in the next shot he is on the other side).
Group 62
1) Good use of handheld camera shots.Eg. when they were running.
2) They included correct elements.
3) they used a high variety of shots, e.g. in the libary.
4) They used suitable material for the taste, which is good for kids
5) The costume was not suitable for the target audience as the trousers were too low for a young age!!!! However the costume for Tyler in the library was very well & u suited u tyler ;) jokes
6) Editing was thought about carefully
7) transitions were limited, but worked with clip
8) Sound track fitted in with images e.g slow mo
9) Credits could've been at the beginning as it looked like it was the end of the film
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment